ISSUE STATEMENT AND OPTIONS FOR ISSUE #504
SOLUTION DEFINITIONS AND OPTIONS FOR:
DIRECTION OF IMPROVEMENT: Both the percentage of people on welfare and the duration spent on welfare should be reduced.
ISSUE JUSTIFICATION: The safety net of welfare is an opportunity for society to support fellow citizens in hard times and return them to a self supporting life. However excessive welfare is socially disruptive both by encouraging people not to be responsible and self sufficient and by causing resentment among the working population who must contribute part of their earnings to support welfare. The great challenge of all social programs is in Reagan's words, "to support the needed and not the greedy". Past failures to exercise reasonable controls have resulted in the present near runaway program. Failure to reform the present program will lead to default with massive social disruptions.
AUTHOR: UWSA SANTA CLARA CO EMAIL: humphrey@aimnet.com
REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THIS ISSUE
REVIEW CURRENT VOTING RESULTS ON THIS ISSUE
COMMENT ON THIS ISSUE YOURSELF
RETURN TO THIS ISSUE/SOLUTION MENU
CHOOSE ANOTHER CATEGORY 500 ISSUE
JUSTIFICATION: Welfare is social support to people who are temporarily unable to economically support themselves and their families. Welfare is not a substitute for gainful employment. Requiring welfare recipients to perform work reduces the incentive to go on welfare or stay on welfare.
AUTHOR: UWSA SANTA CLARA CO EMAIL: humphrey@aimnet.com
OPTIONS FOR SOLUTION # 504.1 WORKFARE
REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THIS SOLUTION
REVIEW CURRENT VOTING RESULTS ON THIS SOLUTION
COMMENT ON THIS SOLUTION YOURSELF
RETURN TO THIS ISSUE/SOLUTION MENU
PROPOSE AN AMENDMENT TO THIS SOLUTION
The following is an example of the implementation of this program. The minimum employer wage would be set at $2/hr. However the American people would supplement this by an additional $4/hr for a total of $6/hr minimum employee wage. For each $1/hr in employer wage, the "helping hand subsidy" would decrease by 50¢.
Employeer paid wage . . $2 . . $4 . . .$6 . . $8 . . . $10
Helping Hand Subsidy . . $4 . . $3 . . .$2 . . $1 . . . $ 0
Employee wage . . . . . . .$6 . . $7 . . .$8 . . $9 . . . $10
Reducing the employer wage will make many more jobs available that currently do not justify the present minimum wage. Paying low income workers a living wage, especially when most of that wage is a helping hand from their fellow citizens to supplement the wages that the worker's skills really command in a free market will (along with the termination of welfare) motivate people to work.
JUSTIFICATION: We have only two choices, we can devise a system that both makes jobs available to everyone and motivates people to work or we can continue the present system that both denys people jobs (by setting a minimum employer wage) and encourages people not to work even when jobs are available by making welfare and unemployment too readily available. In the first system everyone contributes to society and fewer people are idle and getting into trouble while in the current system the unemployed are both an economic and social drain on American society.
AUTHOR: UWSA SANTA CLARA CO EMAIL: humphrey@aimnet.com
OPTIONS FOR SOLUTION # 504.2 LOW INCOME WARE INCENTIVE
REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THIS SOLUTION
REVIEW CURRENT VOTING RESULTS ON THIS SOLUTION
COMMENT ON THIS SOLUTION YOURSELF
RETURN TO THIS ISSUE/SOLUTION MENU
PROPOSE AN AMENDMENT TO THIS SOLUTION
JUSTIFICATION: The lack of child care is both a legitimate barrier to working and a convenient excuse. Subsidized child care will enable welfare recipients to work without being concerned over the well being of their children.
AUTHOR: UWSA SANTA CLARA CO EMAIL: humphrey@aimnet.com
OPTIONS FOR SOLUTION # 504.3 SUBSIDIZED CHILD CARE
REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THIS SOLUTION
REVIEW CURRENT VOTING RESULTS ON THIS SOLUTION
COMMENT ON THIS SOLUTION YOURSELF
RETURN TO THIS ISSUE/SOLUTION MENU
PROPOSE AN AMENDMENT TO THIS SOLUTION
JUSTIFICATION: While medical services to welfare recipients is a socially compassionate act, the loss of these services when the recipient starts working is a strong incentive to stay on welfare. Therefore the system must very gradually phase out the free medical services if we realistically expect people to try to get off welfare.
AUTHOR: UWSA SANTA CLARA CO EMAIL: humphrey@aimnet.com
OPTIONS FOR SOLUTION # 504.4 LOW INCOME MEDICAL SUBSIDY
REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THIS SOLUTION
REVIEW CURRENT VOTING RESULTS ON THIS SOLUTION
COMMENT ON THIS SOLUTION YOURSELF
RETURN TO THIS ISSUE/SOLUTION MENU
PROPOSE AN AMENDMENT TO THIS SOLUTION
JUSTIFICATION: Unfortunately the payment of welfare benefits to under age and usually unmarried mothers simply presents a means for teenage girls to achieve financial independence. While many such pregnancies may be unintentional, the present system removes the consequences for everyone and actually encourages others.
AUTHOR: UWSA SANTA CLARA CO EMAIL: humphrey@aimnet.com
OPTIONS FOR SOLUTION # 504.5 NO BENEFITS TO MOTHERS UNDER 18
REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THIS SOLUTION
REVIEW CURRENT VOTING RESULTS ON THIS SOLUTION
COMMENT ON THIS SOLUTION YOURSELF
RETURN TO THIS ISSUE/SOLUTION MENU
PROPOSE AN AMENDMENT TO THIS SOLUTION
JUSTIFICATION: The purpose of welfare is to provide short term financial assistance. Two years is adequate time to recover from a financial crisis and return to gainful employment.
AUTHOR: UWSA SANTA CLARA CO EMAIL: humphrey@aimnet.com
OPTIONS FOR SOLUTION # 504.6 TWO YEAR LIMIT ON WELFARE
REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THIS SOLUTION
REVIEW CURRENT VOTING RESULTS ON THIS SOLUTION
COMMENT ON THIS SOLUTION YOURSELF
RETURN TO THIS ISSUE/SOLUTION MENU
PROPOSE AN AMENDMENT TO THIS SOLUTION
JUSTIFICATION: The increase in welfare payments in proportion to the number of children provides an incentive for additional children.
AUTHOR: UWSA SANTA CLARA CO EMAIL: humphrey@aimnet.com
OPTIONS FOR SOLUTION # 504.7 NO ADDITIONAL WELFARE PAYMENTS FOR ADDITIONAL CHILDREN
REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THIS SOLUTION
REVIEW CURRENT VOTING RESULTS ON THIS SOLUTION
COMMENT ON THIS SOLUTION YOURSELF
RETURN TO THIS ISSUE/SOLUTION MENU
PROPOSE AN AMENDMENT TO THIS SOLUTION
JUSTIFICATION: The requirement to continue living with their parents removes any incentive to become a welfare mother in order to become independent.
AUTHOR: UWSA SANTA CLARA CO EMAIL: humphrey@aimnet.com
OPTIONS FOR SOLUTION # 504.8 MINOR WELFARE MOTHERS MUST LIVE WITH PARENTS
REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THIS SOLUTION
REVIEW CURRENT VOTING RESULTS ON THIS SOLUTION
COMMENT ON THIS SOLUTION YOURSELF
RETURN TO THIS ISSUE/SOLUTION MENU
PROPOSE AN AMENDMENT TO THIS SOLUTION
JUSTIFICATION: Conceiving a child is the most solumn of human responsibilities. The current explosion of children to underage parents who are emotionally and/or financially unable to care for their new human being, is both an inhumane act to their children and theft of the resources of society which must try to assume part of the financial and emotional responsibilities of parenting. Active father identification will make men equally responsible for their actions and hopefully curtail the level of welfare births.
AUTHOR: UWSA SANTA CLARA CO EMAIL: humphrey@aimnet.com
OPTIONS FOR SOLUTION # 504.9 ACTIVE FATHER IDENTIFICATION
REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THIS SOLUTION
REVIEW CURRENT VOTING RESULTS ON THIS SOLUTION
COMMENT ON THIS SOLUTION YOURSELF
RETURN TO THIS ISSUE/SOLUTION MENU
PROPOSE AN AMENDMENT TO THIS SOLUTION
JUSTIFICATION: Many former welfare recipients will not earn enough in any year to begin to repay their welfare and the intent of this proposal is not to be severe. However a portion of welfare recipients do achieve a strong financial position and should be obligated to begin reimbursing society for their welfare payments.
AUTHOR: UWSA SANTA CLARA CO EMAIL: humphrey@aimnet.com
OPTIONS FOR SOLUTION # 504.11 TREAT WELFARE AS A LOAN
REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THIS SOLUTION
REVIEW CURRENT VOTING RESULTS ON THIS SOLUTION
COMMENT ON THIS SOLUTION YOURSELF
RETURN TO THIS ISSUE/SOLUTION MENU
PROPOSE AN AMENDMENT TO THIS SOLUTION